KnowToYes

Political intelligence for land use

Everybody in land finds out too late.

A project is filed, heard, conditioned, approved and bid out. Every one of those steps is public the day it happens. Most of the people with money on the line hear about it months or years later, from somebody else. KnowToYes reads the council, planning and board record so you hear it first.

Council, planning and board records from municipalities across the growth metros of Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Tennessee and Utah. Every record traceable to a meeting and a date.

Three ways in

Start with the question you are asking.

Contractors, suppliers, engineers, lenders

Which projects are coming?

New development applications and land use board items in the counties you work, listed as each jurisdiction publishes them. Years before the plans go out to bid, with the applicant's name on it.

Development Application Tracker

Builders, land teams, funds

Will this board approve what I want to build?

Self-serve reports from the board's own record: the member you are about to meet, the comparable approvals and their conditions, the history of a project you are buying. Municipal Monitoring is free on one municipality.

Reports and monitoring

Data teams and platforms

What is about to change in this market?

Case-level records with the board, date, action, applicant, speakers, topic and a quality score, built to sit next to parcel, permit and market data.

The dataset and API

A real case

Same town, same rule, opposite outcomes.

In Wake Forest, the Board of Commissioners let Reserve at Dunn Creek put front-loaded garages on narrow townhome lots, an exception to the rule that asks for rear access, by a vote of 5-0.

The next applicant to ask, on Rogers Road, copied the conditions without the site reasons behind them. The Planning Board voted unanimously to recommend denial, staff recommended disapproval, and the applicant withdrew. What made the first request clear was said on the record at its first hearing, where anybody could have read it.

Open the sample reports

RZ-22-05, Reserve at Dunn Creek. Approved 5-0 by the Board of Commissioners, 17 January 2023.

RZ-22-08, Rogers Road Townhomes. Denial recommended unanimously by the Planning Board, 11 July 2023. Withdrawn by the applicant, 15 August 2023.

Source: Town of Wake Forest Planning Board and Board of Commissioners minutes and recordings, December 2022 to August 2023.

A project is public for years before the industry hears about it.

Every project passes the same public steps, and each one leaves a record on the day it happens. What separates people in this industry is which step they hear about first.

The public steps in a development project, what each one publishes, and who currently finds out
StepWhat becomes public that dayWho finds out now
ApplicationThe parcel, the applicant, what is proposedAlmost nobody
HearingThe staff recommendation, the vote, the conditions, who said whatWhoever was in the room
Site planThe approved plan and the conditions drawn into itThe engineer and the client
Bid stageThe scope, on a deadlineEvery bidder, at the same moment
PermitThe permit recordThe data vendors, and everyone downstream of them

Source: the sequence as it appears in the jurisdictions KnowToYes covers. Step names and their order vary by state and by town.

Zoning, floodplain, soils and permit counts were structured years ago, and every one of them describes the permit or the ground it sits on. The application and the hearing never were. Two years of one town's meetings runs from about 106 in Wendell to 309 in Apex, somewhere between 150 and 300 hours of senior reading by our published estimate, so the industry waits for the bid stage because that arrives in an email.

The unread part does not go away. It shows up as the denial the earlier hearings pointed to, the condition nobody priced, or the invitation to bid that arrived after the developer had already chosen a contractor.

Why trust it

Built in the field, and graded against what boards actually did.

KnowToYes started as an entitlement practice's own research tool. We test it the hard way: a written prediction built only from records dated before a case was filed, set aside, then graded against the real hearings. On the Lawrence Property PUD in Apex, the prediction called the outcome, the precedent cases, and four of the five opposition themes. It also got one call wrong, and that miss is the most useful part of the write-up.

40 to 60Structured records from a typical three-hour meeting
438Development filings in a ten-jurisdiction pilot, June to September 2026
2 to 4Years from the filing to the plans going out to bid

Source: KnowToYes municipal meeting records, and the Development Application Tracker pilot across ten North Carolina jurisdictions, 23 June to 18 September 2026.

A complete record narrows a deal to the few places where the outcome is genuinely uncertain. The record settles the structure. The last call takes someone who has read enough rooms. That's YES, at yokleyes.com.

Next step

Find out at the application, not the bid list.

If you hear about projects when they go out to bid, tell us the counties you work in and we will show you one real week of filings in them, with the names on them.

If you hear about them at the hearing, Municipal Monitoring is free on one municipality: every council, planning and board action that matches your terms, in your inbox as soon as it reaches our database.